Category: Politics


  • Theme:

    happiness: backfilling our ideology

    1–2 minutes

    We prioritize quality-of-life advancements, yet often conceal them behind veils of profundity like religion, ideology, or political affiliations, deeming our well-being shallow in comparison to national or human rights issues.

    Whether based on social or economic factors, the divide between right and left involves an interplay of literal and heuristic cost-benefit analyses. Accordingly, tribal (political) allegiance does not necessarily imply ideological alignment. Furthermore, a party’s ability to ensure security may overshadow the absurdity of its ideas, until declining quality of life prompts a shift towards opposing camps: my move to well-being and happiness, backfilling our ideology.




  • Theme:

    Perilous Adventure: use your rights

    1–2 minutes

    For those craving perilous escapades, reflect on unexercised rights: Are you utilizing your freedom of speech or bearing arms?
    Society often conflates legality with morality, distinguishing between the civilized and the uncivilized based on superficial markers: a civilized individual shuns firearms and engages in courteous discourse, even while indulging in most of the seven deadly sins.

    This dichotomy invites a reevaluation of the divide between legal standards and moral principles, challenging where true civility lies—in the actions sanctioned by law or the integrity of our conduct.



  • Theme:

    Overreach backlash: the internal spread of sovereignty

    1–2 minutes

    The once governed will not be governed anymore: they can now take the authority of the state upon (and into) themselves.

    This is an unintended reversal after state overreach: as grand-scale economic and judicial governance moved into “biopolitics,” the state breached the realm of the subjective individual.

    This prompted a reclamation of personal sovereignty and a citizen’s extension of the new precedent, not authority without but within. We grasped the line of power pushed into us, and before it could retract, we pulled the rest of state authority into us as well: if they can govern our body, we can govern ourselves.


  • Theme:

    Escaping Bureaucracy via Subversive Excellence

    1–2 minutes

    Occupations characterized by an intense, almost theatrical level of rigidity—think high-stress chefs, firefighters, specific musicians, trauma nurses, comedians, and daredevil professionals like roughnecks and underwater welders—give rise to a subversive realm that rejects the world of bureaucracy. Within their sphere, they construct an unapologetic hierarchy founded on their unique set of values, deliberately rejecting vacant niceties in favor of excess, darkness, and subversion.

    This subculture they create can be simultaneously harsh and light-hearted, degenerate yet communal. By dynamically responding to the demands of their challenging roles, they manage to elevate themselves beyond bureaucratic tedium and political correctness.

    This dynamic suggests that any occupation that relies on soul-draining bureaucratic oversight to manage its employees, policing emotions and behavior through policy, lacks the kind of passionate dedication and precision that fuels human flourishing.

    Occupations like these, which foster counter-cultural subcultures, cultivate communities bound together, relying on one another while nurturing trust (in an oddly perverse way). In contrast, heavily managed, mediated managerial roles tend to fragment employees, leaving them to bond primarily through shared frustration with the irrationality of upper-level decision-making.


  • Theme:

    shapeshifting beliefs (religion and conspiracy)

    1–2 minutes

    The early Christians were experts at playing into other groups’ oral traditions and prophecies. They recruited by shapeshifting, assimilating, and aggregating. It’s like grafting new branches onto your tree. The issue is that they had to write in code because the Romans did not want the church to grow too powerful.
    Compared to today, this long conspiracy and aggregation of alternate cur conspiracies, while at the same time hiding from and despising the power of the state, has interesting effects.

    Early Christians adeptly merged their beliefs with existing oral traditions, recruiting followers through a shapeshifting assimilation. This approach resembled grafting new branches onto an established tree.

    Writing in coded language was crucial as they grew, as overt expansion threatened Roman authority. This blend of espionage, aggregation, and subterfuge under state scrutiny parallels the modern interactions between populist beliefs and established powers.

    From this point of view, it is understandable that a religion distrustful of state authority is primed for conspiracy theories and will morph to adopt survival tactics, even if they are counter to their core tenants.


  • Theme:

    freedom produces managers

    1–2 minutes

    When individuals are granted greater moral/personal freedom, it often leads to social anarchy due to the resulting diversity. This causes people to cry out for more managerial control.

    As established social norms decompose liberty ascends. Our first line of defense, consideration for others and self-regulation, holds no sway because there are no longer social sanctions. To re-establish consideration we turn neighbors into managers wielding policy to regulate what was once informal negotiations.


  • Theme:

    Rock Star v Dragon

    1–2 minutes

    The rockstar creates and energizes while the dragon protects its hoard.

    The glamour of creativity is alluring, yet for most, it is a consumptive trap (drawing more from you than returning to you).

    The less glamorous persistent strategy to maintain wealth and status is not to create but to wrest power and eternal resources, such as real estate, away from the aging dragons: don’t waste your time making; start slaying and squatting.


  • Theme:

    control your flow

    1–2 minutes

    When you “go with the flow,” you abdicate control to access emotions to release stress.

    The problem is we cannot control our moods: they pass through us, and when safeguards are unleashed, some toxic rage or wallowing despair bubbles up, causing self-damaging behavior.

    Yet, we want to be free, lively, and spontaneous, not in a gray, restrictive, robotic life. The paradox is needing control to allow freedom.

    Consider going with the flow, similar to surfing or painting: a masterfully developed skill that does not let go as much as channel attentive excitement into expressive action.


  • Theme:

    Use your worst traits to counter each other

    1–2 minutes

    Our society coaches, in eco-cybernetic fashion, use your worst traits to counter each other.

    To harness your pride, greed, gluttony, vanity, lust, or sloth, empower another (more compelling) sin.

    Apparently, the way to counteract avarice is ambition, and vice versa: the politician will leave office only if he can make more money elsewhere, and the rich man will vacate the market and jump into politics because of his pride.

    Thus, selfish traits have been recast as steadfast (predictable) and mutually beneficial.

    While these counterbalancing forces appear stabilizing, they normalize rationalizing increasingly excessive appetites.


  • Theme:

    Intolerable Contradictions: Egality vs Liberty

    1–2 minutes

    There is a contradiction in appealing to equity and egalitarian outcomes in a society that proclaims individuality as a natural right: the liberated person is an imminently vital figure to be protected.

    Equality is an improbable ideal, and egalitarianism removes rights from some to disperse amongst others. These concepts level through a promoted “normalization,” which is the opposite of sovereign self-making: it is coercive alignment.

    Maintaining a state/society that can move into the future requires a shared set of values (such as equality under the law, the idea that your rights end when they infringe on another, and wealth/position is not a shield.)

    Contradictions can be tolerated when the narrative provides a payoff (a noble or economic goal to be achieved) but become intolerable when confusion unravels stability.