Category: Culture


  • Theme:

    Church’s Role in Sustaining Democracy

    1–2 minutes

    In America, around half of all volunteer-based groups have a religious affiliation. Additionally, between 35 to 40 percent of the population goes to church regularly. However, over the past 50 years, the percentage of people who vote and volunteer has declined by 10 to 20 percent. This decline has also been observed in the "third places" that were once known for community support and socialization.

    In his book "Bowling Alone," Robert Putnam highlights how dwindling participation in community organizations has eroded our ability to run meetings, manage disagreements, bear responsibility, entertain strangers at home, or participate in sports and games.

    As a result of maintaining organized groups, the church has become a primary training ground for civic engagement and leadership, as well as diplomacy. These are fundamental hallmarks that are required for a successful democracy. Religion plays a crucial role in preventing isolationism and atomized individualism, thus retaining social fabric and support.

    In a fraying democracy, the rise of unified voices, and therefore democratic majority, is likely to arise from religions that maintain, train, and unify.

    [tags  democarcy, religion, voting, third place, socialization, politics,]


  • Theme:

    Progress versus progressivism

    1–2 minutes

    Who can be against progress? Don’t you want "change" so that everyone is treated well and fairly? Yes, of course.

    However, progress is merely the process of moving towards a goal, not the goal itself.

    The confusion is that progressivism co-opts the term "progress" to mean a singular vision: a neo-liberal techno-rationalist future of egalitarian leveling that will be beneficial for human enlightenment, comfort, and peace.
    Yet, to many citizens palatable progress is a retroactive return to traditional micro-social communities, which carry the negative connotations of religious fundamentalism and Luddites.


  • Theme:

    Paradox: moral transgression

    1–2 minutes

    A confounding problem for progressive politics is the belief in transgression to move beyond traditional shackles.

    Transgression is anti-moral, in that morality is established by conservative mores, and yet the “equality” progressives seek is essentially moral, and must not be transgressed.

    As usual, at extremes, the deal struck to release us subverts its terms into it’s Achilles heal: to achieve morality we must transgress morality.

    That is, to escape hierarchical domination and become free, we atomize people and norms beyond the commonality that can gauge equality.

    (Inspired by Cristopher Lasch)


  • Theme:

    Honor as a Mirror

    1–2 minutes

    To maintain honor is to behold yourself as others behold you.

    The mirror of society is the distortion that maintains our shape.


  • Theme:

    Blame Game

    1–2 minutes

    “Victims blame the person. Perpetrators blame the situation.”

    Problems can be solved, but recognizing the blame game means people are arguing for ego rather than solutions.

    quote from Rob Henderson


  • Theme:

    You don’t read power: play, delete, repeat

    1–2 minutes

    What if power is not written in stone but like media recorded, played, erased, re-recorded, rewritten repeatedly, and rehashed as nostalgic storylines?

    Power, rather than written on high, appears amidst a kind of dumb, interactive exchange, where power occasionally dons the mask of symbolic order as needed: the “stability of power” makes a strong entrance when needed, but typically, higher truth is absent, letting the axiomatic rewrite us.

    This underscores Fisher’s comments: With power, you only need to see it; you won’t read it. Capitalism is “profoundly illiterate:” “you play it, it plays you.”

    Power is not uni-directional, but a mutual persuasion (you watch it, it writes you, you record over it). It does not need an ideological strategy to win you over but functions like a contagion upon contact, where you invite in repeatedly, aligning yourself to its process, over and over.

    (idea from Mark Fisher)


  • Theme:

    friendship based on lameness

    1–2 minutes

    People often find it challenging to befriend someone who is unpredictable. Even if you are generally somewhat weird, there is a limit beyond which you may become off-putting. Overindulging in your creative freedom can sometimes overwhelm those who simply seek casual entertainment.

    Many relationships seem to be based on your ability to moderate your level of creativity to a degree of lameness, which is not true creativity but rather something adjacent to it – adjacent to being interesting.


  • Theme:

    divine madness

    1–2 minutes

    When something is too chaotic, we desperately attempt to apply logic. It functions despite our worldview, which shifts it into the realm of the mystical.

    It is this encounter with an overwhelming totality that confounds our sense of scale and order when profundity shifts into the sublime. It is our attempt to grasp -rather than accept- this glimpse of the divine that drives us mad.


  • Theme:

    gentrified artists (graffiti)

    1–2 minutes

    In an art magazine Instagram post the editor complained about a lack of graffiti on walls as a sign of artists being gentrified.

    Perhaps. Perhaps the art world has been entirely packaged and purchased. Maybe art was only briefly a transgressive modality and (with the help of this magazine) has returned to propping up transcendent naval gazing (religion or commerce).

    Interestingly, this sentiment was pasted on a digital wall, where outrage amplifies more readily than sloganeering on physical barriers. The internet is a better modern tool, as is money to convert graffiti into a mural.

    As well, to call artists "gentrified" for not vandalizing (bemoaining the loss of rebellion) undermines the succesful inclusivity work the artworld has done to grant all fringe practices space inside rather than out. The point of graffiti (for artists rather than taggers) has been rendered mute.

    I will concede: Defacing the real world is becoming passé. Cluttering my feed with inane observations and advertising is the new trash that concerns me.


  • Theme:

    Be neither steadfast nor flighty

    1–2 minutes

    When opinions change too often, a person is flighty, flakey, or capricious. They are often exciting and novel, chiming in when they should remain silent or neutral. Still, their fickle espousal reveals an irreverence towards truth and stability: they are not cautious or considerate.

    However, the taciturn steadfastness of one who speaks little and never alters their belief is not trustworthy, though they can be dependable. Their similarity in response can be comforting but not a considered appraisal of information in an attempt at truth.

    Both types of people -the flitting vacillator and the stoic ideologue- are intellectually dishonest yet may still appear as engaged in serious inquiry.

    inspired by Nassim Taleb on X