Pacifism claims a moral high ground, often overlooking the historical complexities of global conflict for idealistic humanism. While noble, this moral stance frequently proves futile, especially in the absence of opposing violent forces.*
When an adversary is already contending with violence elsewhere, pacifism becomes a strategic position rather than a revolutionary one, allowing for negotiations and compromises with existing state powers that hold coercive authority. Thus, pacifism bows to violent powers to maintain an ethical stance.
* examples of pacifism prevailing occur when violence on other fronts has decimated or threatened the existing power, meaning pacifism only works when violence is actively applied in some regard.
from Ward Churchill
–
–
–